Vera Kelly notes the advancements in civil rights through her lifetime. She also says that plenty more needs to be done.
“There aren’t ‘white’ or ‘colored’ signs anymore,” said Kelly, who is in her fourth term as president of the Davenport, Iowa, chapter of the NAACP. “We’re getting there. But we’ve still got a lot of work to do.”
This year marks the 60th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The act still resonates in American society.
Considered a landmark in modern American history, the act prohibited inequities in voter registration as well as racial segregation in schools, the workplace and other public facilities.
For decades, there had been calls for a civil rights bill, and measures had failed in Congress annually from 1945-57. Limited acts on civil rights were passed in 1957 and 1960, but activists pushed for more sweeping legislation.
On June 11, 1963, President John F. Kennedy announced his intention to seek a civil rights bill. Eight days later, he sent his proposal to the U.S. House. The bill passed from the House Judiciary Committee to the House Rules Committee that Nov. 20.
Kennedy’s assassination two days later became a catalyst for the passage of the bill. In a joint session of Congress on Nov. 27, new President Lyndon B. Johnson declared that “no memorial oration or eulogy could more eloquently honor President Kennedy’s memory than the earliest possible passage of the civil rights bill for which he fought so long.”
![President Lyndon B. Johnson hands U.S. Sen. Everett Dirksen, R-Illinois, a ceremonial pen during the signing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 on July 2, 1964. Dirksen was one of the chief legislative architects of the final measure and worked across the aisle to halt a filibuster by Southern segregationist senators and ensure the bill received a vote. (Photo by Abbe Rowe, White House photographer, from the Dirksen Congressional Center archives)](https://www.shawlocal.com/resizer/QR2ki8bgYmb0WAU0hsey2NbN8g0=/1440x0/filters:format(jpg):quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/shawmedia/T5VWCAD2IFFFTLTT5R43OD22MU.jpg)
Presidential support for civil rights came with political risk despite large Democratic majorities in both houses. Modern scholars cite Kennedy’s initial reluctance as fear of losing key allies. Long a Democratic stronghold, five southern states shifted Republican in 1964, beginning a trend that remains today.
The bill passed the House in February 1964 but faced bitter opposition in the full Senate when debate opened on March 30. A “Southern Bloc” of 19 senators, 18 Democrats and one Republican launched an 83-day filibuster, the longest in Congressional history, against the bill.
Sen. Robert Byrd, D-West Virginia, spoke for more than 14 hours in opposition on June 10. Sen. Strom Thurmond, D-South Carolina, claimed the bill was “unconstitutional, unnecessary, unwise and extend(s) beyond the realm of reason.”
Sen. Richard Russell, D-Georgia, decried “any attempt or any movement which would have a tendency to bring about social equality and intermingling and amalgamation of the races” in southern states.
After 54 days, Sen. Everett Dirksen, R-Illinois, and three others offered a compromise bill. After Byrd’s stand, the Senate, in a rare move, voted 71-29 to cloture the bill. On June 19, the Senate passed the compromise bill 73-27.
Meanwhile, young volunteers were fanning out across Mississippi to fight for fair voter registration in the Freedom Summer movement. On the evening of June 21, three young volunteers were reported missing en route to a Congress of Racial Equality office in Meridian.
The incident became a national news story and fortified the debate on American civil rights. The bodies of the three men were found Aug. 4.
By then, the Civil Rights Act had become law. The House passed the measure 289-126 on July 2, 1964, and Johnson signed the act that same day.
In addition to racial equality, the act strengthened women’s rights and laid the groundwork for future anti-discriminatory legislation. Many trace the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as well as the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, to the precedent set by the Civil Rights Act.
The immediate impact of the act, though, was limited. Restrictions on voting rights in parts of the South remained, and resistance on a variety of fronts led to court challenges. Still, the legacy of the Civil Rights Act affected daily life for tens of millions of Americans.
Kelly, and many others, believe much is needed for the act to reach its full potential. “Some things are much better than they used to be,” she remarked. “We’re getting there, but we’ve still got a lot of work ahead of us.
“We still deal with racial profiling, and a lot of people don’t have jobs. There are many educated, skilled African-Americans who are the last ones hired and the first ones fired.”
Still, Kelly maintains a positive outlook. “I look to what I call the ‘three Ps,’” she said. “The first is purpose, wanting to change. Then there’s the process, to make it happen. Finally, we all need to keep our promises. Nothing is out of reach. If we all work together and do the right thing, we can make the world a better place for all of us.”
• Tom Emery is a freelance writer and historical researcher from Carlinville, Illinois. He may be reached at 217-710-8392 or ilcivilwar@yahoo.com.