Widow of Sterling firefighter killed in 2021 Rock Falls house fire sues for wrongful death; city says it’s not liable

Rock Falls, lead firefighters say they’re not liable under Illinois’ Tort Immunity Act

Composite image of Garrett Ramos and the memorial constructed shortly after his death while fighting a fire Dec. 4, 2021, in Rock Falls.

MORRISON – The widow of a Sterling firefighter killed in a December 2021 residential fire, has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the city of Rock Falls and the two lead firefighters who were at the scene.

Brittney C. Ramos maintains in her lawsuit that Lt. Garrett Ramos died as a result of the fire chief and deputy fire chief not following proper procedures.

But the city of Rock Falls, Fire Chief Cris Bouwens and Deputy Chief Ken Wolf, who all are named as defendants, counter that they have immunity under Illinois law. They also said Ramos was partially responsible for missteps he made that contributed to his death in the Dec. 3, 2021, fire. The fire lasted until Dec. 4, and Ramos died that day.

Brittney Ramos, who is seeking in excess of $50,000 in damages, filed her suit in Whiteside County Court on Dec. 1, 2022, three days before the one-year anniversary of her husband’s death.

Ramos was discovered unresponsive and out of air in the basement of the home about 30 minutes after two of his mayday calls went unanswered.

A year ago, in April 2022, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration released its initial incident report, dated March 8, outlining multiple “willful” errors made during the fire. The final report was released in December, and as a result, the cities of Sterling and Rock Falls paid a combined $36,000 in fines for “lapses” in each department’s policies and procedures.

Those lapses that contributed to Ramos’ death from “asphyxia caused by inhalation of products of combustion due to a structure fire,” the report said.

While the direct cause of Ramos’ death was “exposure to respiratory hazards,” the indirect causes were a failure “to identify the presence or absence of a basement,” and a failure to ensure that firefighters entering the home “were operating on the designated [radio]frequency,” among others, OSHA said.

Among other things, Ramos’ suit cites the OSHA findings and cites Bouwens’ failure to assess that the home at 10031 Ridge Road had a basement.

“One of the most basic responsibilities of a supervising firefighter is to immediately determine if a structure has a basement before directing firefighters into the structure,” according to the suit. “This information is vitally important because a basement increases the risk that the fire will damage the floor beneath the firefighters, and in-turn increase the risk of the floor collapsing resulting in serious injury or death. ...”

The suit also accuses Bouwens and Wolf of failing to call off firefighting efforts when the garage was destroyed and the home was engulfed, when part of the roof collapsed, when part of the floor collapsed and when the fire was deemed under control.

Each time, “there was absolutely no need to risk RFFor SFD personnel to remain in a home that contained no occupants and was not salvageable,” according to the suit.

It also cites their failure to identify and find Ramos after he made two mayday calls in the wake of the floor collapse.

Such errors constitute “willful and wanton violations of accepted firefighting practices,” according tothe suit.

That language is important, because under the terms of the Illinois Tort Immunity Act, neither the city nor its employees can be held liable”for any injuries cause by any acts or omissions while engaged in fighting a fire, absent proof that the defendants engaged in willful and wanton conduct,” their attorneys, Michael Kujawa and Deborah Ostvig of Schain, Banks, Kenny & Schwartz Ltd. of Chicago, said in their response to Ramos’ complaint.

The same holds true for any failure to supervise or negligent supervision, or for using their discretion in deciding how, when and where to fight a fire, according to the response.

“Clearly, the decisions made by defendants in determining how to fight the fire ... all necessarily entailed the balancing of competing interests, i.e., available resources, its obligations to the owners of the subject property and the safety of the firefighters. This balancing process, and all the decisions stemming therefrom, are discretionary in nature.”

The defense also asserts that Bouwens, Wolf and the city were not the proximate cause of Ramos’ death, and that he ”was under a duty to exercise reasonable care and caution for his own safety.”

Ramos “failed to ensure that his radio was on the correct channel; failed to remain with his partners while fighting the subject fire; failed to refill his oxygen tank in a timely manner; and otherwise failed to exercise reasonable care and caution for his own safety,” the defense said. “Because decedent Garrett Ramos is more than fifty percent (50%) at fault in causing his own accident and injuries, his recovery is barred.”

Should Brittney Ramos win a judgment for damages, it should be reduced based on her husband’s role in his own death, according to the defense’s response.

A motion to dismiss the suit was denied March 29. The next case management conference is July 17.

Have a Question about this article?
Kathleen Schultz

Kathleen A. Schultz

Kathleen Schultz is a Sterling native with 40 years of reporting and editing experience in Arizona, California, Montana and Illinois.