Environmentalists and local residents against the NorthPoint Development project in Joliet say they believe their case against the warehouse development will go to trial in 2023.
A Will County judge on Nov. 29 dismissed four counts in the plaintiff’s lawsuit against the project but let two stand.
Openlands, Sierra Club and Just Say No to NorthPoint this week issued a news release stating the judge’s decision means their case “will move forward for trial in 2023.”
No trial date has been set for the case.
But the organizations contend in the press release that the court decision marks a breakthrough in the defense put up against the lawsuit by NorthPoint and the city of Joliet, which also is a defendant.
The lawsuit was filed in 2020, as opponents went to court to try to stop the project that was moving through Joliet with approvals from the City Council and Plan Commission amid strong opposition, especially from residents and officials in Elwood and Manhattan who spoke against it amid concerns about increased truck traffic.
“We have been resolute in our fight, and the judge’s decision to deny NorthPoint and Joliet’s dismissal request gives all of us a voice and an opportunity to truly be heard,” Stephanie Irvine, an individual plaintiff and organizer with Just Say No to NorthPoint, said in the news release.
The project is now 2,300 acres in size and reaches to Elwood. Opponents believe NorthPoint eventually plans to expand it to the edge of Manhattan. Construction already has begun in an area along Route 53 near Millsdale Road.
Joliet City Attorney Sabrina Spano said a trial in 2023 is not a sure thing.
“It’s not,” Spano said. “There’s no trial date set.”
Spano said the pretrial stage is still in process, and the city and NorthPoint could appeal the judge’s decision to let two counts in the lawsuit stand or file motions for the judge to reconsider.
Sierra Club Illinois Chapter spokesperson Hannah Lee Flath in an email response to questions Wednesday said that the plaintiffs believe the case will go to trial next year and the judge’s decision to allow two courts to stand provides a path to ultimately stop the NorthPoint project.
“A plaintiff needs to prevail on only one theory to win a case,” Flath said. “Plaintiffs are confident that they will have their day in court to show why this legally and environmentally flawed project should not be located here.”
Judge John Pavich let stand one count alleging that the Joliet zoning process for the NorthPoint project violated due process rights of the objectors. He also let stand a count alleging that the land annexation for the NorthPoint project was unlawful.
Pavich said in his ruling that the plaintiffs’ claims if proven would show a violation of due process rights during zoning for the project but added “the court is somewhat skeptical that the individual plaintiffs will ultimately prevail on this count.”
In allowing one count alleging an unlawful land annexation, Pavich described the legal requirements for pursuing the particular claim as “extremely liberal.”